[Ecm-discuss] Re: 5,329-
Paul.Zimmermann at loria.fr
Mar 2 Jan 15:59:03 CET 2007
> From: Robert Silverman <Robert_Silverman at raytheon.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:27:06 -0500
> 5,329- C155 = p76.p80
> p76 =
> p80 =
> This is the last Cunningham number that I will be able to do for at least
> a while.
> I no longer have the required CPU resources.
Snif, that was the test number we used in GMP-ECM. Now we have to choose
another one. I suggest we choose a 200-digit number, which is the current
gnfs record. Possible candidates are:
Peter, which ones of those numbers are easier by snfs than gnfs?
I wish all of you plenty of new factors for 2007!
Plus d'informations sur la liste de diffusion Ecm-discuss