[Pharo-project] 'Win 32' and others....
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Wed Mar 17 21:34:14 CET 2010
I was concerned about 'win32' versus 'Win 32' versus 'Win32'
I'm having fun (really) rewriting by hand all the SmalltalkImage current and I reading the code and fixing it.
This is cool I'm learning a lot of simple stuff.
>> Issue 2159: We should clean all the platformName = 'Win32' and: [osVersion = 'CE']
>> This is not good to have all these strings to encode platform support.
>> We should move some code to SmalltalkImage
>> ^ 'Win 32'
>> ^ (self platformName = 'Win32' and: [self osVersion = 'CE'])
> Concerning readability, both are readable.
> Concerning discovering capability (what are all specific Win32CE
> features in the image ?), the message is easier to track than the
> Concerning maintenance (hability to change implementation
> details/features), the message is clearly superior.
> For example, I can imagine you buy a device that isWin32CECompatible.
> OK, bad example it's more past than future ;)
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
More information about the Pharo-project