[Pharo-project] About SimpleMorphic

Schwab,Wilhelm K bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
Sun Nov 7 21:38:36 CET 2010


Sig,

I disagree; the layout policy should arrange the morphs it controls.  To do otherwise demands that the morphs be able to cope with any type of layout one might want.  The various algorithms have to go somewhere; they might as well go in the layouts.

Bill


________________________________________
From: pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Igor Stasenko [siguctua at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 2:50 PM
To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] About SimpleMorphic



it is hard to say, what layout policies we may need, and what can be
removed/simplified. What i feel wrong with scheme,
that from message names it feels like a container morph is responsible
for layout,
while i think, that it is submorph(s) themselves should be responsible
and know how to place
them within parent morph.





More information about the Pharo-project mailing list