[Pharo-project] About SourcedMethodReference

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Tue Nov 9 22:57:02 CET 2010

I think identity is better. It forcing more strict rules: no more than
one method reference
in system necessary for representing same method.

On 9 November 2010 23:48, Luc Fabresse <luc.fabresse at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> When SourcedMethodReference have been introduced, some tests in
> SystemNavigationTest turned yellow.
> The tests are currently expecting a MethodReference.
> If I modify the tests to exepect a SourcedMethodReference, the problem is
> now on:
> SourcedMethodReference>>=
>        ^self == aMethodReference.
> Why this has been redefined in SourcedMethodReference?
> I think that the super class (MethodReference) implementation is
> semantically better. No?
> MethodReference>>= anotherMethodReference
> "Answer whether the receiver and the argument represent the
> same object."
> ^ self species == anotherMethodReference species
> and: [(self classSymbol = anotherMethodReference classSymbol)
> and: [(self classIsMeta = anotherMethodReference classIsMeta)
> and: [self methodSymbol = anotherMethodReference methodSymbol]]]
> #Luc

Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list