[Pharo-project] Issue 3216 in pharo: [enh] Support for Metacello in Monticello

pharo at googlecode.com pharo at googlecode.com
Thu Nov 11 12:11:50 CET 2010

	Status: Comment

Comment #4 on issue 3216 by stephane.ducasse: [enh] Support for Metacello  
in Monticello

I do not understand why this code changes the addSlice implementation?
Why do you do that/
Slices have nothing to do with metacello.
Why dirty packages are removed?

why PseudoClass>>asClassDefinition is removed.....
Sorry but it looks plain bad!!!!

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list