[Pharo-project] Let's get rid of Core vs. Full
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Apr 3 22:23:21 CEST 2011
On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:34 PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
> I really agree with you Marcus. It sounds to me that core/dev is a
> black and white approach.
> I know there are no resources, but what do you think of starting with
> a minimum image and the build over more sophisticated images?
> -Kernel image
> -Core image
> -Image with really basic browsing/scm tools (OB, Script Manager,
> Shout, etc) - or "developer basic"
> -developer standard (the current dev)
> -developer scientific
> -developer web
> that wouldn't result in more easier integrations?
I'm not sure that you want a lot of different setups because it means checking problems due to interactions.
So far we cannot maintain 2 so I do not see why more would help.
a core + packages + a dsitribution browser to load certified distributions
we want a mini-core + a set of maintained pharo packages + a configuration files
When we work on them
-> new mini core + automatic publication of new packages + new configuration files
Right now this process does not work so this is a ***pain*** I spent 2 hours
one sunday to fix some stupid problem with shout in OB just because we do not have
good tools on top of metacello and because loading packages is slow.
More information about the Pharo-project