[Pharo-project] Transcript rant

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Mon Apr 4 16:07:00 CEST 2011


On Apr 4, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Toon Verwaest wrote:

> On 04/04/2011 03:55 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>>> +1 for both of Igor's mails!
>>>> Why? this is really important to have threadsafe transcript and it is good to have a look at
>>>> what juan did.
>>>> 
>>>> We should be able to use a transcript even without morph.
>>> It's that exactly what Igor was fighting for?
>> ah ok this was totally unclear.
> I don't know the implementation, nor the old nor the new. I just read his email and thought it made a lot of sense.
> 
> For example where he lost you, he's just saying that it shouldn't matter if the transcript is something that is showing something in a window in the image, or if it's streaming the data to some external client somewhere. The API should just be the writestream API where it's used, independent of how it's being viewed by the second user who is reading the output printed on the transcript.

I agree on that :)

> It sounds like at the moment it's mixed and the user can also start reading from the transcript... that seems wrong since the data might have been sent over the wire; thus being gone and not available anymore in the transcript. Viewing the transcript is something totally different than writing to it.

Thanks.

> 
> cheers,
> Toon
> 




More information about the Pharo-project mailing list