[Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Do we want this for Pharo 1.2 and futures?

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 17:00:19 CEST 2011


Discussion finished.
Marcus, can we add in the PharoDev images a installScript.st with the code
that was executed to generate the image?  yes, the ConfigurationOfPharo
load....


On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Miguel Cobá <miguel.coba at gmail.com> wrote:

> installScript definitely yes.
>
> changelog is useful if it is accurate and maintained else better avoid
> it. Packages I never found a reason for it to be in the zip. not very
> useful for newbies because they don't now what a package is based only
> in the name and for a experimented user, they can find the packages
> directly in the image.
>
> So, I think that they won't be missing.
>
> Cheers
>
> El sáb, 12-03-2011 a las 20:13 +0100, Mariano Martinez Peck escribió:
> > In Pharo 1.0 and 1.1 I used to include certain files in addition to
> > the .image and .changes. These files were: changelog.txt,
> > installScript.st and packages.txt
> > So...what do you think? are they (still) useful ?   if true, then we
> > should add it to hudson. If not, we just ignore it.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Mariano
>
> --
> Miguel Cobá
> http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz
> http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/attachments/20110404/91fa3be9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pharo-project mailing list