[Pharo-project] [Pharo-users] Do we want this for Pharo 1.2 and futures?
Mariano Martinez Peck
marianopeck at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 17:00:19 CEST 2011
Marcus, can we add in the PharoDev images a installScript.st with the code
that was executed to generate the image? yes, the ConfigurationOfPharo
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Miguel Cobá <miguel.coba at gmail.com> wrote:
> installScript definitely yes.
> changelog is useful if it is accurate and maintained else better avoid
> it. Packages I never found a reason for it to be in the zip. not very
> useful for newbies because they don't now what a package is based only
> in the name and for a experimented user, they can find the packages
> directly in the image.
> So, I think that they won't be missing.
> El sáb, 12-03-2011 a las 20:13 +0100, Mariano Martinez Peck escribió:
> > In Pharo 1.0 and 1.1 I used to include certain files in addition to
> > the .image and .changes. These files were: changelog.txt,
> > installScript.st and packages.txt
> > So...what do you think? are they (still) useful ? if true, then we
> > should add it to hudson. If not, we just ignore it.
> > Thanks
> > Mariano
> Miguel Cobá
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-project