[Pharo-project] Let's get rid of Core vs. Full

Hernán Morales Durand hernan.morales at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 03:00:20 CEST 2011


Please someone clarify, are you going to kill the core?

Honestly I don't know how people survive with the dev image, I guess
you have super fast laptops.

Not my case, and the Core just run nice in "old" hardware.

2011/4/4 Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com>:
> As I can understand the proposal of Marcus is not have anymore an
> image without the minimal set of tools for development. And I full
> agree with this option.
>
> Allways is possible to shrink the image in a next step if needed. In
> other words, to me Core is not useful witthout a minimal set of dev
> tools and I'm doing production deployments with such tools with no
> problems. By other hand, as most of the images are in remote servers I
> need to use them via VNC and with the dev tools.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> 2011/4/4 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba at gmail.com>:
>> This is what I understood from what Marcus said, too :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 15:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>
>>> This is my ideas.
>>>
>>>> My proposition for 1.3:
>>>> 1) Add MetacelloBrowser and switch to version-separated repositories (like MetaRepoForPharo11, etc. -I don't like the "abbreviated names" but you get the idea)
>>>> 2) Reduce the "full" image to Core+OB+RB+Shout+OCompletion+Finder+MetacelloBrowser
>>>> 3) If it is possible, develop Core image into this reduced full image.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>>
>
>



-- 
Hernán Morales
Information Technology Manager,
Institute of Veterinary Genetics.
National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET).
La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799.
Internal: 422
Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799.



More information about the Pharo-project mailing list