[Pharo-project] Let's get rid of Core vs. Full

Hernán Morales Durand hernan.morales at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 03:00:20 CEST 2011

Please someone clarify, are you going to kill the core?

Honestly I don't know how people survive with the dev image, I guess
you have super fast laptops.

Not my case, and the Core just run nice in "old" hardware.

2011/4/4 Germán Arduino <garduino at gmail.com>:
> As I can understand the proposal of Marcus is not have anymore an
> image without the minimal set of tools for development. And I full
> agree with this option.
> Allways is possible to shrink the image in a next step if needed. In
> other words, to me Core is not useful witthout a minimal set of dev
> tools and I'm doing production deployments with such tools with no
> problems. By other hand, as most of the images are in remote servers I
> need to use them via VNC and with the dev tools.
> Just my opinion.
> Cheers.
> 2011/4/4 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba at gmail.com>:
>> This is what I understood from what Marcus said, too :)
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 15:57, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>> This is my ideas.
>>>> My proposition for 1.3:
>>>> 1) Add MetacelloBrowser and switch to version-separated repositories (like MetaRepoForPharo11, etc. -I don't like the "abbreviated names" but you get the idea)
>>>> 2) Reduce the "full" image to Core+OB+RB+Shout+OCompletion+Finder+MetacelloBrowser
>>>> 3) If it is possible, develop Core image into this reduced full image.
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> "Every thing should have the right to be different."

Hernán Morales
Information Technology Manager,
Institute of Veterinary Genetics.
National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET).
La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799.
Internal: 422
Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799.

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list