[Pharo-project] abouth nautilus and the removal of CodeHolder hierarchy

Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.pharo at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 14:20:56 CEST 2011


I think that as soon as MorphTreeMorph is improved, you can use it for SMx, or take it as it is right now, and apply fixes ^^



Ben


On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote:

> what about my initial question? it got buried beneath other
> discussions in this thread.
> Ben, can you give your opinion ? Im interested because for the SMx
> port, this would help in narrowing the classes to import.
> 
> Fernando
> 
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor.girba at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 6 Apr 2011, at 08:16, Alain Plantec wrote:
>> 
>>> Le 05/04/2011 22:03, Alain Plantec a écrit :
>>>> Le 05/04/2011 20:57, Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
>>>>> A new browser :)
>>>>> Supporting
>>>>>    - groups
>>>>>    - package
>>>>>    - declarative menus
>>>>>    - environment selection
>>>>>    - scoped actions
>>>>>    - soon refactoring
>>>>> 
>>>>> but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build by TreeMorphTreeMorph
>>>> yes, maybe MorphTreeMorph is not the good tree to use here.
>>>> why not use a simpler one ?
>>> or try with LazyMorphTreeMorph even it should be improved. (it should be changed to build the list in background).
>> 
>> That would be super cool :)
>> 
>> Doru
>> 
>> 
>>>> Alain
>>>> 
>>>>>> Squeaksource simply says "A new browser"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> 
>> "Presenting is storytelling."
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 




More information about the Pharo-project mailing list