[Pharo-project] Transcript rant

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Apr 17 19:59:53 CEST 2011


How can I get the old transcript?

Stef

On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Fernando Olivero wrote:

> I propose some modifications to the Transcript as a (singleton) class,
> and revert to the use of TranscriptModel.
> 
> See the latest post on 3948:	Transcript and ThreadedTranscript needs
> to be merged.
> 
> Fernando
> 
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 April 2011 20:24,  <csrabak at bol.com.br> wrote:
>>> Em 06/04/2011 09:07, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>> On 6 April 2011 13:54, Fernando Olivero <fernando.olivero at usi.ch>
>>>    wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Hi Stef, i will as an initial step take Igor's suggestion and make
>>>>> Transcript a global wich  points to an instance of TranscriptModel
>>>>> ( the new name i propose for the current class taken from CUIS).
>>>>> I still  believe that composition  is better then  inheritance for
>>>>> handling different behaviors of the Transcript, so i argue against
>>>>> making it a subclass of WriteStream and making it polymorphic with
>>>>> a write stream instead.
>>>>> 
>>>>  That's totally  not my concern. As  long as thing  which sits there
>>>>  responds to writestream protocol , i don't care about rest.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Would it make sense then to lift the methods from {write}stream and
>>> put then in a Trait so the composition is made through reuse of code?
>>> 
>>> My 0.0199999....
>> 
>> hehe.. yes, but if to follow this road every time you need to do small
>> improvement,
>> then at some day you will discover that you rewriting whole system
>> from scratch :)
>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cesar Rabak
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>> 
>> 
> 




More information about the Pharo-project mailing list