[Pharo-project] [SPAM] Re: [COTDC] 3 - HTTPClient

Dale Henrichs dhenrich at vmware.com
Mon Feb 7 21:52:40 CET 2011


Haha,

Perhaps there should also be a rating for class comments ... G, PG, R, 
NSFW...

Dale

On 02/07/2011 12:07 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> this is more HTTPSocket
> I'm sure that philippe will love to answer :)
>
> Stef
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
>
>> Actually, can somebody explain the troll-mode comment? Why is the
>> HTTPClient an example of how not to write code? Should we not be using
>> this package in production? What does the comment about  "hacker with
>> telnet"-protocol mean?
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Luc Fabresse<luc.fabresse at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/2/7 laurent laffont<laurent.laffont at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> FYI I put results
>>>> here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest
>>>
>>> Thanks Laurent.
>>> It is a really great because it document the system and I learn a lot at the
>>> same time ;-)
>>> #Luc
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Laurent
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
>>>> <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> :)
>>>>> We should just merge the two :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <trollmode>
>>>>>>>> I'm a good example of how not to write code. Turn around, walk away,
>>>>>>>> fast. I'm fully of bugs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Somebody at some point thought that HTTP is a simple "hacker with
>>>>>>>> telnet"-protocol. It's not.
>>>>>>>> </trollmode>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's actually HTTPSocket, not HTTPClient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although it is a negative comment, it is the truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, adding some comments and lowering the pain for others is still a
>>>>>> good idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>





More information about the Pharo-project mailing list