[Pharo-project] could we agree to remove caseOf: and caseOf:otherwise:

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Wed Feb 16 18:15:38 CET 2011


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> wrote:

> Eliot a final question.
> So how will you handle OPAL compiler change in Cog?
> Do you require that marcus and jorge have to deal with decompiler of
> caseOf: in addition to all the rest?
> Is it a strong requirement? Because then this is clear that Opal will be
> delayed. But may be it is not that important after all.
> Just curious.
>

OPAL is a Smalltalk compiler.  I can therefore assume that it will compile
Smalltalk.  caseOf: is valid Smalltalk and so will be compiled by OPAL.
 Whether Marcus chooses to optimise caseOf: or not is up to him.


> Stef
> (if you think that I focus on details then I'm certainly an idiot).
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/attachments/20110216/7e2c4345/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pharo-project mailing list