[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: Cog VM -- Thanks and Performance / Optimization Questions

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 19:04:54 CET 2011

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:

> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Thanks juan
>> We will look at it :)
>> Having a fast and safe transcripter is good.
> Good. At least there one person in our communities is interested on this.
> I am disappointed, as the number of people who actually commented on the
> relevance of said TranscriptStream problems, or on how my new
> implementations succeeds or fails to fix them is zero.
> Not that I really believed I would "instantly become a hero"... But I can't
> understand how nobody else had trouble with the Transcript in the past, to
> the point of taking a look at the code, trying it, and commenting on it.

Igor and I agree.  We want TranscriptStream to remain a subclass of
WriteStream, by all means thread-safe (I think the one in the Teleplace
images is thread-safe), and including a log file is fine.  But the view must
be separate.


> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/attachments/20110221/53623c02/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list