[Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Re: Cog VM -- Thanks and Performance / Optimization Questions

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Wed Feb 23 00:21:22 CET 2011

On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Juan Vuletich <juan at jvuletich.org> wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Thanks juan
> We will look at it :)
> Having a fast and safe transcripter is good.
> Good. At least there one person in our communities is interested on this.
> I am disappointed, as the number of people who actually commented on the relevance of said TranscriptStream problems, or on how my new implementations succeeds or fails to fix them is zero.
> Not that I really believed I would "instantly become a hero"... But I can't understand how nobody else had trouble with the Transcript in the past, to the point of taking a look at the code, trying it, and commenting on it.
> Igor and I agree.  We want TranscriptStream to remain a subclass of WriteStream, by all means thread-safe (I think the one in the Teleplace images is thread-safe), and including a log file is fine.  But the view must be separate.

sorry but TranscriptStream was not thread safe else I would not have written threadSafeTranscript.


More information about the Pharo-project mailing list