[Pharo-project] we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker
miguel.coba at gmail.com
Sun Feb 27 19:01:48 CET 2011
El dom, 27-02-2011 a las 12:02 +0100, Norbert Hartl escribió:
> On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe
> > > https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
> > Does anybody has experience with them?
> > It would be good to be able to play with them.
> I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support
> in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks
> similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me
> one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of
> source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket
> from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is
> #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is
> <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker
> by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit
> than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs
> check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot.
Yes, redmine has those capabilities too. And as you said, they are very
helpful indeed to automate things.
> Sad but true biblicello  wasn't in place at the right time. I think
> it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage.
>  http://a-bibliocello.gemstone.com/bibliocello/
More information about the Pharo-project