[Pharo-project] Popularity of Smalltalk in Software Industry

Cédrick Béler cdrick65 at gmail.com
Thu May 5 17:39:41 CEST 2011


Le 5 mai 2011 à 17:32, Toon Verwaest a écrit :

> On 05/05/2011 05:26 PM, Cédrick Béler wrote:
>> 
>>> Lastly, most Smalltalk systems are image based...
>> 
>> ...which makes you feel the system is "alive", hence one **huge benefit** of Smalltalk: its debugger which enables on the fly debbuging... and also test driven development (real one [1]) where you can run incomplete code and code what's missing iteratively when you need it (Smalltalk is a live system, not only a language as somebody said lately).
>> 
>> Cédrick
>> 
>> [1] see in particular this webcast: http://www.pharocasts.com/2010/01/starting-with-sunit-and-debugger.html
> Seriously ... these points in favor of the image are so m00t. Lets see how it would work without an image:
> 
> I write a C application which I link to GCC. Now I run GDB on my application, and while running I have the whole GCC compiler collection at my disposal while running. While debugging (at some breakpoint) I just let the GCC library compile some C code for me; I turn on the executable flag and whooptidoo, I have a Smalltalk like debugger for C.
> 
> This is totally unrelated to having an image; it's just a great debugger implementation. 2 completely different things. No reason why this wouldn't work for C; except for the fact that they didn't do it yet (those lazy bastards).

ok, true :)

but, it's not only the debugger... getting senders, implementers, class that use it, methods that contains this word, ...
of course, this is doable with files (see eclipse *sigh*), but I prefer the snappy feeling of an image for that...






More information about the Pharo-project mailing list