[Pharo-project] Popularity of Smalltalk in Software Industry

Toon Verwaest toon.verwaest at gmail.com
Thu May 5 17:50:42 CEST 2011

On 05/05/2011 05:46 PM, Dave Mason wrote:
> On May 5, 2011, at 11:32, Toon Verwaest wrote:
>> This is totally unrelated to having an image; it's just a great debugger implementation. 2 completely different things. No reason why this wouldn't work for C; except for the fact that they didn't do it yet (those lazy bastards).
> ... and that it's an order of magnitude more difficult!
> Yes, there are certainly other aspects of being image-based that are way cool, but iterative code development and debugging is a big part of it.
> (I am teaching a Java course right now with BlueJ, which is a cool environment (at least if you're not used to an image-based system like Smalltalk).  It provides a little UML diagram of your classes, and you can create an object by clicking on the appropriate class, and inspect, and call methods.  Objects that you create appear on a "workbench".  So I had build up a little example with a few objects, found a bug, and edited the class, hit "compile" and *poof* empty workbench.  Yes, in Java they probably could have emulated the image, but it's a lot of work!)
> ../Dave
It's more difficult because it's not integrated yet. Suppose that this 
was already integrated within GDB? Suppose GDB looked like a Smalltalk 
debugger? Is there anything technical that stands in your way?

C is annoying for many other reasons, but not for that one.

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list