[Pharo-project] legal counsel for pharo?
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Thu May 12 16:12:30 CEST 2011
On May 12, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "Stéphane" == Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr> writes:
> Stéphane> what is the position of squeak regarding the inclusion of qwak
> Stéphane> code in squeak?
> GPL code is incompatible with Squeak core, because it taints the entire
> (LGPL code *might* be permitted, but nobody has asked the question
> firmly enough yet. We'll have to consult counsel at that point.)
> Since OpenQwak is GPLv2, code from that distro is not allowed. However,
> some of the upstream components are released under a compatible license,
> and could be included if offered.
what is an upstream component?
How could openqwak can release a component not GPL if Qwak is GPL?
> It would *not* be possible to take
> the downstream patches from OpenQwak though, as once again, that would
> taint the distro.
> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
> <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
> See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
More information about the Pharo-project