[Pharo-project] Set with nil
tibabenfortlapalanca at gmail.com
Fri May 20 09:40:47 CEST 2011
If we understand nil as the empty set (like some other languages do), then
Set with: nil is not any different than Set with: Set new.
2011/5/20 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>
> On 20 May 2011 04:13, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > Since a year ago, we have this issue:
> > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907
> > There were 2 solutions proposed, and the 2 were developed by different
> > people. But for some reason it was not integrated and continuously
> > postponed.
> > So, my question is: Do we want Sets accepting nil? If we don't, the
> > is invalid. If we do, can someone review the code proposed?
> Its not invalid. Stef reminds me about it from time to time.
> And actually we wanted to sit and review and integrate it but it
> always something else needs our attention.
> > Thanks!
> > Guille
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pharo-project