[Pharo-project] Set with nil

Stéphane Ducasse stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Fri May 20 09:53:12 CEST 2011


On May 20, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:

> If we understand nil as the empty set (like some other languages do),

???
No nil is not the empty set this is the undefined object.

Stef


> then Set with: nil is not any different than Set with: Set new.
> 
> 2011/5/20 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>
> On 20 May 2011 04:13, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since a year ago, we have this issue:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1907
> >
> > There were 2 solutions proposed, and the 2 were developed by different
> > people.  But for some reason it was not integrated and continuously
> > postponed.
> >
> > So, my question is: Do we want Sets accepting nil?  If we don't, the issue
> > is invalid.  If we do, can someone review the code proposed?
> >
> 
> Its not invalid. Stef reminds me about it from time to time.
> And actually we wanted to sit and review and integrate it but it
> always something else needs our attention.
> 
> > Thanks!
> > Guille
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
> 
> 




More information about the Pharo-project mailing list