siguctua at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 07:01:54 CEST 2012
The main issue as to me is not the logic how ocompletion works (i find
it pretty ok btw), but
paramount of mess in event handling.
I don't mind having multiple kinds/styles of autocompletion in system
(so users can choose to their taste)..
but what i don't understand is why we need different shortcuts and
different ui displaying completion list(s),
spreading over multiple places in system.
On 3 August 2012 22:19, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-08-03, at 22:12, Tudor Girba <tudor at tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>> Please keep in mind that the reason for showing only the OCompletion list at first was speed. If you are using both at the same time, you might get a performance penalty.
> so far it works reasonably fast.
> and looking at the code I see that the complete list is calculated each time anyway.
> not showing the complete list IMO renders the completion utterly useless.
More information about the Pharo-project