[Pharo-project] git interesting article

Guido Stepken gstepken at googlemail.com
Sat Feb 11 10:49:17 CET 2012

Interesting posting. But i don't think, that this is the right model for
refactoring, where a lot of 'depreciated classes' (reason: copyright,
restructuring, replacement, creating 'orthogonality', whatever) cause much
collateral damages in hundreds of packages, like it is in pharo at the
IMHO, there are three models necessary with three different cycles going
round robin, with different *emphasis*:

1. advancing cycle in development as described in the article
2. refactoring cycle with strong emphasis on sunit and testing
3. package update and compatibility cycle

#3 is similar to the 'maintainer model' in Debian development process.
Smalltalk *users* (meant: app developers) should overtake, because it's
rather in their interest.

#2 'Beauty is, where we refactor it': User and core developer interest.

#1 core developer only. 'Users' rather destroy, because things get too
complicated. (debugger, event handler)

regards, Guido Stepken
Am 10.02.2012 21:11 schrieb "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse at inria.fr>:

> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
> tx dale for the pointer
> stef
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/attachments/20120211/4666514d/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list