[Pharo-project] glamour and pharo
stephane.ducasse at inria.fr
Sun Jan 1 22:58:53 CET 2012
> I agree that people should load what they want on top of a nice little core.
> But, most people will load exactly the same thing: one set of development tools that should do the basic work nicely. This was the point of the Pharo distribution. And it shipped with OB and it was great. Only OB is rather limited, and apparently, it will not be supported anymore :). So, from this point of view, a browsing infrastructure is relevant for the Pharo distribution.
> Now, to me it seems that there is a problem with what different people understand by Pharo. And I think it would be good to clarify how we should get to the core image so that Lukas can get peace of mind :)
> p.s. And I told you that Glamour is small, not big :)
I know. So we will see. Continue to push Glamour because we need tester of the changes we are doing - like the massive cleaning of the VM events handling. :)
More information about the Pharo-project