[Pharo-project] Cog+linux: external module not found

Schwab,Wilhelm K bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
Tue Jan 31 17:21:08 CET 2012


Search.  I've said it for YEARS now - I've been VERY CLEAR ON THIS.  Maybe I'm too clear??  Yes, I'm mad, but not enough to hurt Smalltalk, and not really at you.

How about an electronic handshake and some movement toward making FFI work?


From: pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Igor Stasenko [siguctua at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:14 AM
To: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Cog+linux: external module not found

On 31 January 2012 17:01, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bschwab at anest.ufl.edu> wrote:
> Sig,
> I'm tired of reading that I'm asking people to do work FOR ME.  I am "asking" for things that will allow me to do things for YOU. Want the attached in useful form?  Maybe you don't - numerical analysis is a "home" to me.  ***I**** have what I need - YOU don't.

But you never said something like that before, i.e. "when you will
have *that*, i can release/improve *this* so everyone can benefit".
Unless you say what are you working on and what/why you need something
, how else we can know?

> I'm done with this bickering over semantics and being told how I'm leaning on others.  When callbacks are supported, I will use them to turn the attached (and more, plus >100 stucture defs) into something that YOU can use and make it available for YOU.  Until then, I don't have the time to waste on a half-baked solution with C callbacks that will be discarded once Spock arrives.
> BTW, some Gnuplot and PLplot bindings are in a similar situation.  Yours *when* the infrastructure is in place.  Last I'm going to say on this.  I will NOT change things twice - too damn much work.

do you have some tool for generating these bindings? because if not,
then indeed its too much work to do manually.

Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.

More information about the Pharo-project mailing list